Chesterfield County · November 3, 2026
Chesterfield’s 2026 ballot: questions and candidates
Exact ballot wording and plain-English Yes/No explanations for the three constitutional amendments and the local school-tax referendum, plus a sourced guide to the candidates appearing across Chesterfield’s ballot styles.
State constitutional amendment · Question 1
Reproductive freedom
Text on the ballot
Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to (i) protect the freedom to make personal decisions about prenatal care, childbirth, postpartum care, birth control, abortion, miscarriage management, and fertility care; (ii) protect doctors, nurses, and patients from being punished for these decisions; and (iii) allow for restrictions on access to abortion during the third trimester of pregnancy except when the patient's health is at risk or the pregnancy cannot survive?
Plain-English translation
This would add a constitutional right to make decisions about reproductive care, including the care listed in the question. Government could not burden that right unless it met a demanding legal test. The amendment would still allow the state to regulate abortion in the third trimester, but not prohibit it when a physician determines it is medically needed to protect the pregnant patient’s life or physical or mental health, or when the fetus is not viable.
- Yes means
- Add the reproductive-care right to Virginia’s Constitution, protect patients and providers from punishment for exercising it, and bar adverse action based on a person’s pregnancy outcomes or voluntary help to another person. Third-trimester regulation remains permitted subject to the stated exceptions; the amendment does not itself create a ban.
- No means
- Do not add this constitutional right. A No vote does not itself ban abortion or change the law; it leaves reproductive-care decisions governed by existing law, without this proposed constitutional protection.
Official wording and explanation: Virginia Department of Elections, Question 1.
State constitutional amendment · Question 2
Marriage
Text on the ballot
Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended to (i) remove the ban on same-sex marriage; (ii) affirm that two adults may marry regardless of sex, gender, or race; and (iii) require all legally valid marriages to be treated equally under the law?
Plain-English translation
This would remove Virginia’s constitutional ban on same-sex marriage and replace it with a state-constitutional right to marry for two adults. The state could not deny a marriage license because of the adults’ sex, gender, or race, and it would have to treat lawful marriages equally.
- Yes means
- Remove the ban from the state Constitution and add the stated marriage right and equal-treatment requirements.
- No means
- Leave the current constitutional ban in place. It is not enforceable under the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges decision, but Virginia’s official explanation says it could become enforceable again if the Court overturned that decision.
Official wording and explanation: Virginia Department of Elections, Question 2.
State constitutional amendment · Question 3
Voting rights
Text on the ballot
Should the Constitution of Virginia be amended (i) to provide for the fundamental right to vote in the Commonwealth, (ii) to revise the qualifications of voters so that a person convicted of a felony is not entitled to vote during his period of incarceration but is automatically invested with the right to vote upon release from incarceration, and (iii) to update the existing prohibition on voting by persons found to be mentally incompetent to instead apply to persons who have been found to lack the capacity to understand the act of voting?
Plain-English translation
This would establish a fundamental right to vote for people who meet Virginia’s voter qualifications. A person convicted of a felony could not vote while incarcerated for that conviction, but voting rights would return automatically upon release. A court could remove a person’s voting right only after specifically finding that the person lacks the capacity to understand the act of voting—not simply because the person has a disability or a broader incapacity finding.
- Yes means
- Adopt those changes. Felony-related voting rights would return automatically on release from incarceration; no individual restoration by the governor would be needed. A specific court finding about understanding voting would be required for the capacity-based restriction.
- No means
- Keep the current rules: a felony conviction removes voting rights unless the governor restores them, and a court finding of incapacity can remove voting rights under the existing broader standard.
Official wording and explanation: Virginia Department of Elections, Question 3.
Chesterfield County local referendum
School sales tax
Text on the ballot
Shall the County of Chesterfield be authorized to levy a local general retail sales tax at a rate not to exceed one percent to provide revenue solely for capital projects for the construction or renovation of schools serving the County of Chesterfield and which shall expire on July 22, 2046?
Plain-English translation
This asks whether the county may impose an additional local sales tax of up to 1 percentage point, with the money dedicated only to school construction or renovation capital projects. The tax would not begin automatically after a Yes vote: the Board of Supervisors would still have to adopt an ordinance. If the full 1% were imposed, the county says its standard sales-tax rate would rise from 6% to 7%. Qualifying groceries and essential personal-hygiene products would be exempt from the added tax. If approved and implemented, the tax would expire July 22, 2046.
- Yes means
- Give Chesterfield County authority to levy the additional local sales tax at a rate no higher than 1%; it still takes a separate county ordinance to impose it. Revenue would be restricted to qualifying school capital projects and related financing costs. The county says that if the tax is implemented, it would pair it with proposed reductions of 2 cents in the real-estate tax rate and 10 cents in the personal-property tax rate; those changes would require separate Board action.
- No means
- Do not authorize this dedicated local sales tax. This referendum would not provide the county this added taxing authority; it would not itself change existing sales or property tax rates.
Official ballot wording: Virginia Department of Elections, November 2026 ballot questions (see Chesterfield County). Tax mechanics and exemptions: Chesterfield County’s 1 For Schools referendum page.
Candidates · November 3, 2026
Who is on Chesterfield’s ballot—and what have they said?
The county’s official sample ballots show a U.S. Senate race for all voters, but the U.S. House race varies by address: some Chesterfield precincts are in the 1st District and others in the 4th. Some ballot styles also include a special School Board or Board of Supervisors race. Check the county’s ballot-style guide and your own sample ballot; not every voter sees every candidate listed below.
These are brief summaries of documented positions—not endorsements or a complete comparison of every policy. Campaign pages describe candidates’ own positions. Ukraine votes below are specific recorded votes, not a claim about every form of foreign assistance. “Not found” means I could not verify a public position in the sources reviewed; it does not establish what a candidate privately believes.
U.S. Senate · statewide
Mark R. Warner · Democrat · incumbent
General positions: His campaign emphasizes affordability, health-care access, housing and infrastructure, protecting reproductive freedoms, and national security. On immigration, he supports a combination of border security and a pathway to citizenship.
Ukraine: Warner says continued support helps Ukraine defend itself and serves U.S. security. On April 23, 2024, he voted Yea on Senate passage of H.R. 815, the national-security supplemental that included Ukraine assistance.
Sources: campaign platform · VPM candidate Q&A · Senate Roll Call 154 · immigration policy.
Bert Mizusawa · Republican
General positions: His campaign stresses reducing federal spending and debt, lowering taxes and living costs, protecting veterans’ benefits, cutting health-care costs, banning congressional stock trading, and expanding nuclear energy.
Ukraine: Mizusawa has no congressional voting record. In an October 2026 interview he said, “I do support Ukraine,” while questioning why America should bear other countries’ burdens and criticizing NATO allies’ contributions. He also said buying Russian diesel could provide leverage to bring Russia and Ukraine back to negotiations. He has not committed publicly to a specific Ukraine-aid vote or amount.
Sources: campaign platform · WAVY interview · FOX 5 interview.
U.S. House · your district depends on your address
1st District
Shannon L. Taylor · Democrat
General positions: Her campaign emphasizes lowering family costs, fighting corruption and special-interest influence, public safety, and her record as Henrico County’s commonwealth’s attorney. Her campaign materials also discuss health care, Social Security and Medicare, and reproductive rights.
Ukraine: I found no sourced public position on U.S. Ukraine aid and no congressional voting record; she has not served in Congress.
Sources: campaign site · Virginia 1st District voter guide.
Robert J. “Rob” Wittman · Republican · incumbent
General positions: His campaign emphasizes affordability and tax relief, domestic energy production, small businesses, border enforcement, and military readiness, including shipbuilding and defense manufacturing.
Ukraine voting record: Wittman voted Yea on the April 2024 Ukraine Security Supplemental Appropriations Act (H.R. 8035), then Nay on the June 2026 Ukraine Support Act (H.R. 2913). These were different bills; the votes alone do not explain his reasoning or establish his position on every kind of Ukraine assistance.
Sources: campaign issues · House Roll Call 151 (2024) · House Roll Call 207 (2026).
4th District
Jennifer L. McClellan · Democrat · incumbent
General positions: Her campaign emphasizes affordability, housing, health care and reproductive rights, clean energy, education, and voting rights. Her national-security platform stresses NATO and other alliances and support for servicemembers and veterans.
Ukraine voting record: McClellan voted Yea on the April 2024 Ukraine Security Supplemental (H.R. 8035) and the June 2026 Ukraine Support Act (H.R. 2913). Those votes establish support for those specific measures; they are not a complete summary of her foreign-policy views.
Sources: campaign national-security platform · House Roll Call 151 (2024) · House Roll Call 207 (2026).
Robert P. “Family Man” Murray, Jr. · Republican
General positions: His campaign focuses on affordability, health-care access and prevention, small businesses and energy costs, privacy and civil rights, and government accountability. He says he would vote against foreign aid until domestic programs such as Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid, and food assistance are fully funded.
Ukraine: In an interview, Murray questioned Russia sanctions, favored restoring trade and access to lower-cost Russian imports, and called for ending the war. His general pledge against foreign aid suggests he would oppose Ukraine aid while those domestic-funding conditions remain unmet, but I found no separate Ukraine-specific vote pledge. He has no congressional voting record.
Sources: campaign platform · WTVR interview.
Joan E. “Andrews” Bell · Independent
General positions: Her campaign’s published material centers on opposition to abortion. I found no detailed broader legislative platform in the sources reviewed.
Ukraine: No public position on Ukraine aid found; no congressional voting record.
Source: campaign site.
Local special elections · only on some ballot styles
Clover Hill District School Board
Christina Romers Brady · nonpartisan
General positions: She emphasizes school funding and facilities, teacher retention and competitive pay, student mental-health support, responsible technology use, and meeting individual students’ needs. She supports the school sales-tax referendum and the division’s current student-support policy, including parental notification requirements.
Ukraine: No public Ukraine position found; this local office has no congressional Ukraine-aid votes.
Sources: campaign priorities · VPM candidate interviews.
Elizabeth L. Schultz · nonpartisan
General positions: A former Fairfax County School Board member, she emphasizes academics and career pathways, parent involvement, transparent spending, and student privacy. She supports limits on elementary Chromebook use and sex-separated bathrooms and other private spaces. She declined to endorse or oppose the sales-tax referendum, saying taxpayers should decide.
Ukraine: No public Ukraine position found; this local office has no congressional Ukraine-aid votes.
Sources: campaign site · VPM candidate interviews.
Dale District Board of Supervisors
LeQuan M. Hylton · incumbent supervisor
General positions: His local priorities include school and early-childhood investment, affordable housing and senior tax relief, health-care access, safer and more walkable neighborhoods, transit and Route 10 development, and expanded early-voting access. He is the only named candidate on the Dale District special-election sample ballot.
Ukraine: No public position on Ukraine aid found. Hylton serves locally and has no congressional Ukraine-aid voting record.
Sources: campaign priorities · county supervisor biography.
Candidate names and which races appear by precinct: Chesterfield County’s official ballot-style guide and Style 1, Style 2, Style 3, Style 4, and Style 5.